Sign in

    NET Power Inc (NPWR)

    Q4 2024 Earnings Summary

    Reported on Mar 10, 2025 (Before Market Open)
    Pre-Earnings Price$5.25Open (Mar 10, 2025)
    Post-Earnings Price$5.25Open (Mar 10, 2025)
    Price Change
    $0.00(0.00%)
    • Unprecedented demand for clean, reliable power solutions positions NET Power's technology to meet critical market needs over the next 10 to 15 years. Daniel Rice emphasized that the market is extremely tight and that there is a massive demand for scalable, reliable power, especially with the surge in AI and data centers, which NET Power is uniquely positioned to supply. He stated, "We're still in a position where we have pretty good line of sight of being the lowest cost form of clean firm power... on a time scale basis." ,
    • Strategic focus on cost optimization and modular design aims to make NET Power the lowest-cost form of clean firm power. The company is actively pursuing value engineering, modularization, and standard plant designs to reduce costs and enhance scalability. This includes launching a large modular multi-unit feasibility study targeting coastal locations that enhances scalability and reduces cost, which could significantly improve their competitive positioning. ,
    • Supportive political environment and potential increase in 45Q tax credits could enhance project economics. NET Power's technology aligns with the current administration's focus on domestic energy security, utilizing domestic natural gas and increasing oil production. Daniel Rice mentioned the potential for enhancements to the 45Q tax credits, which could be beneficial, stating that "there's a couple of credible scenarios where you could see the utilization go from the $65 to something like $105... Those things would definitely be beneficial to us."
    • Significant increase in project costs: The total installed cost estimate for the SN1 project has risen from an initial estimate of $950 million to between $1.7 billion and $2 billion, representing approximately 100% increase. This escalation is due to inflationary pressures and site-specific challenges.
    • Project delays and adjusted timeline: The company has paused further long lead equipment orders and adjusted the project timeline, with groundbreaking for SN1 now projected in 2027 and an in-service date in 2029, subject to securing necessary capital. This represents a significant delay from previous expectations.
    • Challenges in securing capital and project financing: NET Power acknowledges the difficulty in raising the approximately $600 million to $900 million in new capital needed to fully fund the SN1 project, leading to uncertainty about project financing and timelines. The company is exploring strategic partnerships but has yet to secure the required funding.
    MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange

    Project Permian (SN1) Cost

    FY 2025

    $1.1 billion

    $1.7 billion to $2 billion

    raised

    Liquidity and Capital Deployment

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    Ended FY 2024 with $533 million in cash, cash equivalents, and investments; for FY 2025, plans to prudently deploy capital

    no prior guidance

    Cost Reduction and Value Engineering

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    Focus on value engineering to reduce costs for SN1 and future projects; feasibility studies for multi‑unit projects along the Gulf Coast

    no prior guidance

    Strategic Partnerships and Capital Solutions

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    Actively exploring strategic partnerships and capital solutions at both the project and company levels

    no prior guidance

    Market Positioning

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    Aims to position itself as the lowest‑cost form of clean, firm power at a reasonable premium, targeting the 2030–2035 timeframe

    no prior guidance

    TopicPrevious MentionsCurrent PeriodTrend

    Clean, reliable firm power

    In Q1–Q3 earnings calls, NET Power repeatedly emphasized the consistent demand for clean, reliable firm power driven by data centers and grid shortages, often mentioning long-term fixed‐price PPAs and underscoring baseload requirements.

    Q4 reinforces the same demand but now incorporates a stronger focus on rapid load growth from AI and data centers as well as grid shortages, linking it to the new scale of energy requirements.

    Consistent emphasis with an enhanced focus on AI-driven demand that could be pivotal for future growth.

    Modular design and scalability

    Across Q1–Q3, the company detailed its standardized modular design and fleet deployment strategy to reduce costs, shorten timelines, and achieve economies of scale.

    In Q4, this topic is expanded with strategic studies on modular multi‐unit feasibility and coastal deployment opportunities, highlighting plans for larger “mega modules” and cost optimization.

    Consistent theme with new geographic and design opportunities emerging in Q4.

    Reliance on government policies and the 45Q tax credit

    Q1–Q3 discussions emphasized bipartisan support for the 45Q tax credit and the importance of government policies in making projects economically viable, with detailed historical context of the credit’s enhancements.

    Q4 continues to stress the significance of supportive policies but introduces increased uncertainty about potential changes to the 45Q tax credit and its future value.

    Steady importance but a shift toward uncertainty regarding policy parameters.

    Escalating capital expenditures, cost inflation, and project delays

    In Q1, there was modest discussion about capital expenditures, while Q2 and Q3 highlighted inflationary pressures (e.g., on CCGTs and equipment) and some delays, noting impacts on schedules and costs.

    Q4 shows heightened emphasis on escalating CapEx (raising Project Permian’s cost estimate from $950 million to up to $2 billion), reinforced by financing challenges and clear project delay risks.

    A consistently raised concern, with Q4 exhibiting a marked intensification in negative sentiment.

    Technological differentiation via oxy-combustion and CO₂ capture

    Q1, Q2, and Q3 provided detailed accounts of the innovative oxy‐combustion process and CO₂ capture capabilities, positioning the technology as a competitive decarbonization solution with substantial capture rates.

    Q4 does not dive as deeply into these technological details, although it mentions synergies such as CO₂ capture partnerships, reflecting a slight de‐emphasis in explicit discussion.

    A core technological strength remains, but the explicit focus has tapered slightly in Q4.

    Emerging emphasis on AI-driven demand and data center market

    Q1 through Q3 consistently noted the critical power demands of data centers and hyperscale facilities, with references to steady baseload needs and the high energy consumption of AI applications.

    Q4 amplifies this by explicitly linking AI-driven load growth to unprecedented demand over the next 10–15 years, further anchoring its strategic market positioning.

    A consistently important theme that is even more pronounced in Q4.

    New strategic studies for modular multi-unit feasibility and coastal deployment opportunities

    Earlier quarters (Q1–Q3) did not mention any studies or focus on coastal deployment strategies.

    Q4 introduces new strategic studies targeting modular multi‐unit feasibility for coastal sites, indicating exploration of cost and logistical advantages outside inland areas.

    A new topic emerging in Q4 that could significantly impact long-term scalability and cost efficiency.

    Shifting sentiment from optimism about low-cost clean power to rising costs and financing challenges

    In Q1 little was said about sentiment shifts while Q2 and Q3 acknowledged moderate cost inflation and financing complexities with some optimism maintained about market opportunities.

    Q4 reflects a marked shift as rising costs (e.g., CapEx increases) and financing difficulties are more explicitly and negatively highlighted, reducing earlier optimism.

    A clear trend toward increased concern over financing and cost escalations, signaling potential challenges ahead.

    Reduced focus on EPA recognition

    Q1 featured strong emphasis on the EPA’s emissions rules and the company’s ability to meet strict CO₂ capture requirements.

    Q2–Q4 show no significant mention or reduced emphasis on EPA recognition compared to earlier discussions.

    An area that appears to have been de-prioritized in later quarters, indicating a strategic shift away from EPA-centric framing.

    Long-term risks from financing challenges and policy dependency

    Q1 presented a balanced view with a focus on strong cash positions and supportive policies, while Q2 also discussed financing strategies and the risks tied to policy dependency.

    Q4 again raises financing obstacles and hints at policy shifts affecting project viability, with a clearer articulation of long-term risks affecting timelines and scalability.

    A consistently recognized risk that is becoming more accentuated, underscoring potential future impacts on performance.

    1. CapEx Increases
      Q: Can you break down the CapEx changes and their causes?
      A: Management explained that CapEx has increased due to supply-demand imbalances, escalation in materials and labor costs, and site-specific issues with Project Permian. Challenges include supply-demand constraints in the energy industry, especially with electrical gear, as well as first-of-a-kind issues and Permian-specific items contributing to the overall increase. ( )

    2. Funding Gap Solutions
      Q: How will you address the $600–$900 million funding gap?
      A: They outlined four ways to approach funding: project-level capital, NET Power topco-level capital, government support (DOE or Texas Energy Fund), and commercial partnerships. They are exploring all options creatively, especially commercial partnerships, to bridge the funding gap. ( )

    3. CapEx Outlook
      Q: How do you see thermal CapEx declining over time?
      A: Management does not expect CapEx deflation soon due to tight supply chains. Instead, they plan to achieve cost reductions through multi-pack deployments, prefabrication, modularization, and coastal applications, leading to meaningful CapEx reductions despite industry-wide inflation. ( )

    4. Market Demand Awareness
      Q: Do power end users realize the upcoming capacity crunch?
      A: They believe the market does not fully grasp future power price increases and availability issues. The market is seen as extremely tight through the end of the decade, with production capacity of CCGTs being exhausted. NET Power is taking time to recalibrate and focus on delivering low-cost, clean, reliable power to meet long-term needs. ( )

    5. Industrial Platform Partnership
      Q: Details on the industrial scale NET Power platform?
      A: They are excited about the industrial platform, which opens up new markets needing smaller-scale, 24/7 clean power solutions. NET Power will be a pure licensor in this program, driven by Baker Hughes and Woodside, earning revenue from licenses without material capital outlay. ( )

    6. Modularization Plans
      Q: What are the milestones for modularization efforts?
      A: Modularization is viewed as a powerful cost-reduction lever. While logistical constraints limit it at inland sites like Permian, they are working with an engineering firm to design mega modules for future coastal deployments. This year, they aim to assess feasibility and begin pre-FEED to quantify cost savings. ( )

    7. California Opportunities
      Q: Can you discuss the opportunity with Carbon TerraVault in California?
      A: NET Power sees the partnership with Carbon TerraVault as synergistic, co-locating power plants above CO₂ storage vaults owned by CRC. This allows for new baseload power generation in California, a state that hasn't built such facilities in a decade. They are scoping out the first gigawatt of plants, with a focus this year on work that will inform future projects. ( )

    8. Team Expansion
      Q: Has your team scaled up or down recently?
      A: The team has continued to grow, adding key technical roles in 2024. Partners like Zachry, Air Liquide, and Lummus have also expanded their teams. There are hundreds of people working on the project daily, reflecting increased activity and commitment from all key partners. ( )

    9. Gulf Coast Focus
      Q: Are you still pursuing North MISO opportunities?
      A: While not delayed, they are prioritizing projects that offer the lowest cost first. After the Permian FEED, they plan to start with coastal applications, such as the Gulf Coast, which offers advantages like existing infrastructure. They are not limited to the Gulf Coast but see it as an attractive starting point. ( )